TIP Group(SH:605255) Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang·2025-09-23 15:13Core Viewpoint - Tianpu Co., Ltd. (605255) announced a stock suspension for verification due to a significant price increase of 317.72% over 15 consecutive trading days, indicating a serious deviation from the company's fundamentals [2] Group 1: Acquisition and Financial Details - The acquisition involves a total payment of 2.123 billion yuan, with all funds confirmed to be in place as of September 17, 2025, and sourced entirely from self-owned capital [3] - The core acquirer, Zhonghao Xinying, has had most of its contingent liabilities from previous agreements waived, with only 11.27% of the obligations remaining unwaived [4] - Zhonghao Xinying's potential repurchase obligations amount to approximately 1.731 billion yuan, with significant portions already deemed invalid or under preliminary agreement for waiver [4] Group 2: Market Reactions and Trading Activity - Following regulatory measures, Tianpu's stock turnover rate increased threefold, reflecting market digestion of regulatory information and investor confidence in the new controlling shareholder's capabilities in the AI chip sector [6][5] - The stock's turnover rate reached 3.21% on September 22, significantly higher than the average of 1.07% over the previous five trading days [6] Group 3: Corporate Governance and Future Plans - Tianpu has clarified that there are no plans for asset injections or major business changes by Zhonghao Xinying in the next 12 months, and no asset sales or mergers are planned [7] - Commitments have been made to avoid share pledges for 36 months, which helps mitigate risks associated with control changes [8] Group 4: Regulatory Environment and Future Uncertainties - The control change process still faces uncertainties, including the need for compliance confirmation from the Shanghai Stock Exchange and potential risks related to share distribution [9] - The company has undergone scrutiny regarding insider trading, with findings indicating that prior stock transactions by insiders did not constitute insider trading [9]