多国密集承认，巴勒斯坦建国之路为何如此艰难？

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent surge in international recognition of the State of Palestine, with 152 out of 193 UN member states acknowledging it, while the US remains the only permanent member of the Security Council not to do so [1] - The article highlights the stark contrast between the international community's support for Palestine and the absence of the US and Israel from discussions, emphasizing Netanyahu's firm stance against the establishment of a Palestinian state [1] - The article raises questions about the selective application of international law, noting that the same legal framework that facilitated Israel's establishment seems ineffective for Palestine, pointing to a historical pattern of double standards [1] Group 2 - The article introduces the concept of double standards in international law, where countries often act inconsistently regarding human rights and trade norms, undermining the legitimacy of institutions like the UN and World Bank [2] - A discussion among experts defines double standards as the differential treatment of similar situations without sufficient justification, revealing how powerful nations manipulate international law to serve their interests [2][3] - The article emphasizes the need for inclusive dialogue to address the challenges posed by double standards, as the credibility of the international legal system is fragile and requires protection [3] Group 3 - The article explores the historical context of double standards, suggesting that they are not a new phenomenon but rather a consistent feature of state behavior, particularly in the context of international law [8][9] - It discusses the implications of double standards in various fields of international law, including human rights, immigration, and climate law, highlighting the need for consistent application of legal principles [6][10] - The article also notes that the perception of double standards can lead to a crisis of legitimacy for international law, particularly when powerful states disregard legal norms while expecting compliance from weaker nations [27][29]