民进党秘书长称没有台湾光复节，国台办：荒唐透顶

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Secretary-General, Xu Guoyong, regarding Taiwan's historical status have sparked significant controversy, with strong condemnation from the Kuomintang (KMT) and a rebuttal from the Taiwan Affairs Office, asserting that Taiwan's status as part of China was established post-World War II and is supported by international legal documents [1][2]. Group 1 - Xu Guoyong's claim of "no Taiwan Restoration Day" is criticized as a distortion of history, with the KMT labeling it as "extremely absurd" [1]. - The Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Chen Binhua, argues that Taiwan's return to China is a key outcome of World War II and part of the post-war international order, asserting that the issue of Taiwan's status was resolved in 1945 [1]. - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Proclamation, and Japan's surrender terms are cited as confirming China's sovereignty over Taiwan, emphasizing that historical facts cannot be altered [1]. Group 2 - Chen Binhua emphasizes that those who betray history and the nation will face justice and that the unification of China is an inevitable historical trend [2]. - There is a call for Taiwanese compatriots to stand on the right side of history, oppose "Taiwan independence," and work towards national unification and rejuvenation alongside mainland compatriots [2].