为什么不要把“读书”神话了？

Group 1 - The article discusses the hierarchical nature of language and concepts, emphasizing that terms like "animal" and "dog" belong to different levels of classification [1][2] - It highlights the confusion surrounding the term "reading," which has been interpreted in various ways, leading to a dilution of its meaning [3][4][6] - The author critiques the notion that reading alone guarantees success, pointing out that practical knowledge and skills often yield better results in real life [10][11][12] Group 2 - The article argues that traditional education and reading are often aimed at securing employment rather than fostering genuine knowledge [13][14] - It suggests that many books provide limited and outdated information, making real-world experience and research essential for acquiring relevant knowledge [15][16][18] - The author identifies three types of valuable books: those that explain fundamental principles, those that teach specific skills, and specialized works that delve deeply into particular fields [19][20] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying themes and dynamics in various aspects of life, such as competition and relationships, which can be informed by strategic thinking [22][24][25] - It argues that networking and gathering diverse information from different sources are crucial for developing a clear understanding of one's environment [26][27] - The author expresses concern about the overwhelming amount of information in the digital space, suggesting that valuable insights may be lost amid the noise [29][30]