“AI味”到底是什么味儿？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of "AI flavor" in written texts, highlighting how certain stylistic features are perceived as indicators of AI-generated content, leading to a societal debate on the implications of AI in writing and expression [2][34]. Group 1: Characteristics of "AI Flavor" - "AI flavor" is often identified through specific writing patterns, such as structured lists ("firstly... secondly... finally"), jargon, and excessive punctuation like dashes [2][4]. - Commonly recognized features of AI writing include a three-part writing structure, a mechanical tone, and a tendency to use personification and metaphors excessively [4][8]. - Texts labeled with "AI flavor" are perceived to lack depth and detail, often repeating the same point with different phrasing, leading to a sense of emotional detachment [9][10]. Group 2: Differences Between AI and Human Writing - Research indicates that AI-generated texts tend to use more complex vocabulary, with certain obscure words appearing up to a hundred times more frequently than in human writing [11][12]. - AI models like GPT-4o show a preference for sophisticated terms, while basic AI models use more common language, reflecting a divergence in writing style [16]. - In a comparative study of AI and human writing in Chinese, the use of punctuation marks like dashes and colons was found to be similar, but AI texts exhibited a higher frequency of parallel structures and metaphors [19][22]. Group 3: Public Perception and Usage of AI in Writing - A significant majority (over 85%) of individuals surveyed believe that AI enhances their writing capabilities, indicating a positive reception towards AI assistance [36][39]. - Despite the benefits, there is a notable skepticism regarding AI-generated content, with about 54% of users modifying AI outputs multiple times to align with their personal style and reduce "AI flavor" [40][42]. - The article suggests that while AI can facilitate writing and inspire creativity, it also raises concerns about potential limitations on human thought and expression [43][44].