挑衅完中国，马科斯到美国邀功，不料2个要求，特朗普一个没答应

Group 1 - The core issue is the Philippines' diplomatic struggle with the U.S., highlighted by President Marcos' visit to the U.S. seeking tariff reductions and security support, which resulted in a 20% tariff increase on Philippine exports, up from 17% [1][3] - The U.S. response to Marcos' attempts to leverage the South China Sea issue for economic concessions was notably indifferent, reaffirming the U.S.-Philippines security alliance without discussing specific tariff reductions [3] - The Philippines' strategic dilemma is exposed as it relies on the U.S. for security while facing economic penalties, revealing a harsh reality of being treated as a replaceable pawn in U.S. geopolitical strategies [3][4] Group 2 - China's response emphasizes that U.S.-Philippines cooperation should not harm third-party interests or regional stability, indicating a warning against external interference in Asian peace [4] - Experts suggest that the Philippines should adopt a diversified diplomatic approach, moving away from reliance on a single ally and focusing on its own economic development to create a sustainable peace environment [6]