谁敢动手试试？特朗普算盘落空，中方发话不到24小时，日本拒绝对华加税，用3个字向美国解释

Group 1 - Japan's Finance Minister Kato Katsunobu's response to the U.S. request for tariffs on China was a firm rejection, highlighting Japan's strategic balance in global trade and politics [1][3] - The U.S. has pressured G7, EU, and NATO members to impose tariffs of 50%-100% on China and India, citing their continued import of Russian oil as justification, but this approach lacks broad international support [3][4] - Japan's refusal to impose tariffs is rooted in its economic dependence on China, which is its largest trading partner, with bilateral trade expected to reach $380 billion in 2024 [3][4] Group 2 - Japan continues to import energy from Russia, with oil imports accounting for 1% and liquefied natural gas for 2.3% of total imports, making the U.S. request contradictory [4][6] - Japan's stance emphasizes the importance of WTO rules, as the proposed tariffs violate the most-favored-nation principle, reflecting Japan's commitment to maintaining a rules-based international trade order [4][9] - The rejection of U.S. tariff proposals is not an isolated incident, as other countries like the EU, South Korea, and Australia have also expressed reservations, indicating a decline in U.S. influence among allies [6][9] Group 3 - Japan's economic strategy prioritizes its own interests, balancing its security alliance with the U.S. while maintaining strong economic ties with China [7][9] - Kato's succinct response is seen as a diplomatic art, allowing Japan to assert its position without alienating either the U.S. or China, reflecting Japan's cautious approach in international relations [7][9] - Japan's refusal is viewed as a victory for multilateralism and rules-based trade, reinforcing the commitment to fair trade and economic cooperation in the context of globalization [9]