3 6 Ke·2025-09-24 11:15Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the accelerated divestment of foreign brands in China, marking a significant shift in the market dynamics that have evolved over the past 40 years [4][71]. - The initial entry of foreign brands into China during the reform and opening-up period was characterized by a cooperative approach, as they sought to establish a foothold in a market with limited consumer spending power [5][9]. - By the mid-1990s, as urban consumer groups began to grow, foreign brands started to adopt aggressive strategies, leading to the decline of many domestic brands [10][12]. Group 2 - The article discusses the "two-lever" strategy employed by foreign brands, which involved both establishing retail channels and leveraging brand power to dominate the market [29][40]. - The entry of foreign supermarkets in the 1990s transformed the retail landscape in China, introducing advanced business models and changing consumer shopping habits [30][32]. - The rise of e-commerce and mobile internet has further disrupted traditional retail, allowing smaller domestic brands to thrive by leveraging online platforms [47][51]. Group 3 - The case of Luckin Coffee's rise against Starbucks illustrates how domestic brands have begun to leverage capital and technology to compete effectively with established foreign brands [60][67]. - The article emphasizes that the decline of foreign brands in China is a result of their inability to adapt to the rapidly changing market dynamics and consumer preferences [72]. - The current trend of foreign brands considering divestment to local teams is seen as a potential positive step for their operations in China, allowing for better alignment with local market conditions [71].