Circle：正研究稳定币的“可逆”交易，要从传统金融体系吸取教训

Core Insights - Circle is exploring a "reversible" mechanism for its stablecoin transactions, which could help integrate the stablecoin industry into mainstream finance [1][2] - This move represents a significant shift in the crypto industry's stance, traditionally emphasizing the immutability of transactions as a core advantage of blockchain technology [2][3] - The introduction of a reversible transaction mechanism may attract institutional investors by lowering the barriers to entry and aligning with traditional financial risk management practices [2][4] Group 1: Reversible Transactions - Circle's president, Heath Tarbert, indicated that a refund mechanism for transactions in cases of fraud or disputes could enhance the appeal of stablecoins [1][2] - The proposed mechanism will not directly reverse transactions on the blockchain but will allow for a "reverse payment" process similar to credit card refunds, requiring consensus among parties involved [3][4] - This approach aims to balance the finality of transactions with the need for error correction, addressing concerns from institutional investors [3][4] Group 2: Institutional Focus - Circle's strategy is clearly aimed at attracting banks and large institutional investors, contrasting with Tether's focus on high-frequency trading and emerging markets [4] - To meet the privacy requirements of institutional clients, Circle is developing options for transaction transparency, where transaction amounts can be encrypted while wallet addresses remain visible [4][5] - The regulatory environment in the U.S. is becoming more favorable for stablecoins, with Congress passing a significant bill to regulate the sector, which may further enhance Circle's prospects [5] Group 3: Market Potential - The total value of stablecoins in circulation is approximately $280 billion, with Goldman Sachs predicting a "stablecoin gold rush" is beginning [5] - Circle's USDC market capitalization is expected to grow by $77 billion by 2027, indicating strong future demand [5] - Tarbert downplayed concerns about banks losing deposits to stablecoins, suggesting that funds could flow from other asset classes or even create new wealth [5]