中介这行很乱，但背不起房价下跌这口锅

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the unethical practices of real estate agents, including hiring "actors" to create false demand and pressure sellers into quick transactions, which has led to public outrage and skepticism towards the industry [1][9][10]. Group 1: Industry Practices - Some second-hand housing agents recruit "actors" on social media to view properties and create a false sense of urgency for sellers [1][9]. - An example is provided where an "actor" offered a significantly lower price than the listing, causing the seller to leave in anger [2][5]. - The article discusses the prevalence of such deceptive practices in the real estate industry, indicating that many buyers and sellers have experienced similar issues [3][4]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The article notes that real estate agents often shift their stance based on market conditions, currently favoring buyers due to a surplus of listings compared to potential buyers [18][20]. - It explains that during market downturns, agents are more likely to assist buyers in negotiating lower prices, as buyers have become scarce [23][22]. - The article suggests that agents are primarily motivated by commission and are more concerned with transaction volume than the actual price fluctuations of properties [17][21]. Group 3: Public Sentiment - The public's anger is directed towards agents, with many blaming them for the decline in property prices, reflecting a broader frustration with the market [10][11]. - The article mentions that sellers often fail to accept market realities, leading them to attribute price drops to "black agents" or "malicious buyers" [30][32]. - It highlights a disconnect between sellers' expectations and market conditions, with many sellers believing that collective action can maintain property values [31][32].