Core Insights - Guangzhou ranks first with a score of 448, excelling in economic vitality (89), education (99), and healthcare (92), making it a top choice for livability [2][5] - Hong Kong secures third place with a score of 439, showcasing world-class healthcare (98) and education (97), but faces challenges with high living costs [2][5] - Xiamen enters the list at 17th place with a score of 410, highlighting its favorable climate and transportation, while also attracting significant investment projects [4][5] Summary by Categories Education and Healthcare - Guangzhou achieved a score of 99 in education and 92 in healthcare, leading nationally [2][5] - Hong Kong's education and healthcare scores are 97 and 98 respectively, with notable institutions ranked globally [2][5] - Xiamen scored 86 in education and 78 in healthcare, benefiting from its attractive university environment [4][5] Economic Environment - Guangzhou maintains a favorable housing affordability with a price-to-income ratio of 13, lower than Shanghai and Shenzhen [2] - Hong Kong's economic environment is challenged by high living costs, scoring only 59 in this category [2][5] - Xiamen has attracted major projects from companies like CATL, creating over 30,000 high-paying jobs [4][5] Transportation and Infrastructure - Guangzhou boasts a 124 km metro network and a favorable average annual temperature of 22°C [2] - Hong Kong's transportation score is 93, supported by its extensive public transport system [2][5] - Xiamen's transportation includes a well-connected metro and BRT system, facilitating a "15-minute living circle" [4][5] Overall Livability - The rankings indicate that livability is not exclusive to first-tier cities, but rather depends on balancing economic opportunities, living costs, and public services [6] - The competition among cities suggests that those who can fine-tune their offerings will continue to rise in rankings [6]
2025中国宜居城市30强出炉:广州第1,香港第3,厦门第17
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-09-25 10:33