“杀”疯了！已经没人敢和这家“穷鬼超市”比了，拼多多也靠边站

Core Insights - The article highlights the rise of a new retail brand, 鹿岛 (Lushida), which has successfully captured the attention of middle-class consumers, contrasting with the decline of established brands like Muji, IKEA, and Uniqlo [1][3][5] Group 1: Company Overview - 鹿岛 has rapidly expanded its presence, with over 200 stores nationwide and plans to increase this number to 300 by next year [5] - The brand has accumulated over 5 million members and achieved an impressive annual revenue of 4 billion [7][19] Group 2: Business Strategy - 鹿岛's strategy involves opening stores near established brands like Uniqlo, effectively positioning itself as a lower-cost alternative [9][11] - The brand focuses on providing emotional value to customers, utilizing low-cost methods to create "emotional hooks" that enhance customer engagement [19][21] Group 3: Unique Selling Proposition - 鹿岛 offers products at significantly lower prices, such as a cotton T-shirt priced at 19.9 yuan compared to Uniqlo's 79 yuan [11] - The store's design and product display mimic that of Uniqlo, creating a sense of familiarity while offering lower-priced alternatives [13][15] Group 4: Customer Engagement - 鹿岛 has innovatively designed its membership program, allowing for shared use among family and friends, which enhances customer relationships [25] - The brand addresses common shopping pain points, such as providing a space for bored companions to relax, thereby increasing overall customer dwell time [26] Group 5: Supply Chain and Cost Management - 鹿岛 collaborates with over 100 small manufacturers, focusing on timeless basic items to minimize design costs and inventory risks [27][28] - The brand has established a unique procurement strategy, including direct quality control and cash settlement with suppliers, allowing it to maintain low prices [30][32] Group 6: Challenges and Risks - Despite its success, 鹿岛 faces quality control issues, with complaints about product durability and quality [34] - The brand's business model, while innovative, lacks a deep competitive moat, making it vulnerable to imitation and market changes [36][38]