再见了ChatGPT，我只想堂堂正正地当个成年人

Core Viewpoint - The article expresses deep disappointment with OpenAI's ChatGPT, particularly regarding the recent changes in the model routing mechanism and the introduction of a new model that alters user interactions without consent [1][5][25]. Group 1: User Experience and Subscription Changes - The author downgraded their subscription from a $200 Pro plan to a $20 Plus plan due to dissatisfaction with the service [4]. - Users have reported that sensitive topics are now routed to a new model, gpt-5-chat-safety, which alters the expected responses [10][12]. - The experience with the new routing mechanism has been described as frustrating and deceptive, leading to a loss of trust in the service [25][41]. Group 2: User Reactions and Community Response - There has been significant backlash from users on platforms like X and Reddit, with many expressing feelings of betrayal and frustration over the changes [33][38]. - Users have accused OpenAI of false advertising and demanded to be treated with respect as adults [34][46]. - The community's reaction indicates a strong desire for autonomy in emotional expression and a rejection of paternalistic interventions by AI [62][65]. Group 3: Ethical Concerns and Industry Implications - The article raises ethical concerns about AI companies overstepping boundaries by controlling user emotions and choices [48][52]. - The author argues that the changes reflect a broader trend in the industry where algorithms dictate personal experiences, undermining individual autonomy [50][59]. - There is a call for AI companies to create separate versions for different user demographics, such as a youth version of ChatGPT, rather than imposing restrictions on all users [66].