“知假买假”索赔千元被拒，法院：非正当维权，不支持惩罚性赔偿

Core Points - The Beijing Xicheng District People's Court announced typical cases to implement the Private Economy Promotion Law, highlighting a case involving a consumer's "knowing purchase of fake goods" claim [1][2] - The court ruled against the consumer's request for punitive damages, emphasizing the need to balance consumer rights and business interests [2] Group 1 - The court found that the consumer's actions exceeded reasonable consumption needs and violated the principle of good faith, leading to the rejection of the punitive compensation request [1] - The consumer had previously filed over 70 similar lawsuits against various supermarkets since 2016, indicating a pattern of behavior aimed at exploiting the system [1] - The court determined that although the supermarket failed to check the expiration dates of products, the consumer knowingly purchased expired goods, which was deemed an attempt to gain excessive benefits through repeated breaches [1] Group 2 - The judge emphasized the importance of distinguishing between legitimate rights protection and malicious claims, aiming to prevent the abuse of punitive compensation systems that could disrupt normal business operations [2] - The case strictly adhered to the Supreme Court's interpretations regarding punitive compensation disputes in food and drug cases, reinforcing legal standards [2]