重新定义行业标杆 | 中国融资租赁业双份“质量、影响力典范名单”即将揭晓

Core Insights - The "2025 China Financing Leasing Comprehensive Quality Model" and "2025 China Financing Leasing ESG Impact Model" are nearing completion, with a list of the top 15 leasing companies set to be released [1] - The financing leasing industry is facing challenges such as asset contraction, narrowing interest margins, and transformation pressures, necessitating the establishment of new development benchmarks [1] - The evaluation process for the lists involved multiple rigorous steps, including data collection, preliminary model assessment, self-nomination by institutions, and expert review [1][3] Group 1: Evaluation Framework - The evaluation framework emphasizes a shift from "scale-oriented" to "quality-oriented" assessments, focusing on four dimensions: asset quality, operational stability, professional and innovative capabilities, and contributions to social responsibility [4][5] - The assessment aims to provide a comprehensive view of leasing companies, considering not just size but also the quality of their asset structure, risk control systems, and sustainable profit models [5] Group 2: Data Sources and Methodology - The evaluation utilizes public data and real transaction information to gain insights into the underlying assets of leasing institutions, enhancing the accuracy of assessments [6] - The "2025 China Financing Leasing ESG Impact Model" incorporates the UN Global Compact principles, SASB standards, GRI standards, and local reporting guidelines to evaluate ESG performance [6] Group 3: Industry Direction and Value - The lists aim to guide the industry towards high-quality and socially impactful development, focusing on the role of leasing companies in supporting technological innovation, green transformation, and inclusive finance [7] - The release of the lists serves multiple stakeholders: it acts as a "health report" for financial institutions and investors, a "compass" for leasing companies to identify quality partners, and a new perspective for regulators to observe industry quality [8] Group 4: Authority and Collaboration - The lists are developed through collaboration among four authoritative institutions, ensuring the credibility and objectivity of the evaluations [3] - The involvement of leading organizations in finance, asset trading, credit rating, and ESG services enhances the robustness of the evaluation framework [3][10]