特朗普果然被耍？中国邻国终于强硬一回，说好的3500亿不给美国了

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the failed promise of a $350 billion investment from South Korea to the U.S., highlighting the disparity between the expectations set by the Trump administration and the financial realities faced by South Korea [1][3][20]. Group 1: Investment Agreement Background - In July, the U.S. and South Korea reached an agreement where the U.S. would reduce tariffs from 25% to 15%, and South Korea would create a $350 billion investment fund, primarily funded through loans and equity investments, not cash [5][11]. - The U.S. later demanded the $350 billion as an upfront payment, which South Korea deemed unrealistic and unsustainable given its foreign reserves [7][11][13]. Group 2: Financial Implications for South Korea - South Korea's total foreign reserves amount to $416.3 billion, meaning the requested $350 billion would consume 84% of these reserves, jeopardizing its economic stability [11][15]. - The total direct investment by South Korean companies globally over the past five years is only $348.9 billion, indicating that the U.S. demand exceeds South Korea's recent investment capabilities [13][15]. Group 3: Political and Economic Consequences - South Korean President Lee Jae-myung warned that complying with U.S. demands could lead to a financial crisis similar to that of 1997, which had severe repercussions for the country's economy [15][22]. - The upcoming APEC summit in October is critical, as both nations must negotiate terms that balance U.S. demands for cash with South Korea's need for economic stability [20][27]. Group 4: Negotiation Dynamics - South Korea's negotiation team has shifted to a more assertive stance, proposing that investments be primarily in the form of loans and ensuring that projects are profitable [17][20]. - The article emphasizes that international relations are driven by power dynamics, and South Korea's firm position reflects its need to protect its economic interests against U.S. pressure [24][25].