合力打击“代理退保”黑灰产（财经眼）

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing prevalence of illegal "agent退保" scams in the insurance industry, where individuals and organizations mislead consumers into believing they can recover high amounts of insurance premiums through fraudulent means, ultimately leading to financial losses and loss of insurance coverage for the victims [4][8][9]. Summary by Sections Consumer Experience - A 73-year-old woman from Chongqing fell victim to an illegal "agent退保" scam after being misled by a lawyer on social media, believing she could recover 90% of her premium [5][6]. - After paying a service fee, she was instructed to file a complaint with the financial regulatory authority, which led to an investigation revealing the scam [6][7]. Regulatory Response - The article discusses the actions taken by the Chongqing financial regulatory bureau, which identified the fraudulent activities and assisted the victim in reporting the crime [7][8]. - The financial regulatory authority emphasizes that any complaints must be based on factual evidence and warns against the consequences of providing false information [11][12]. Legal Actions - A case in Fujian Province resulted in the conviction of individuals involved in a "agent退保" scam, marking a significant legal response to such fraudulent activities [10][11]. - The court found that the defendants caused significant financial losses to insurance companies and profited illegally from their actions [11]. Industry Impact - The rise of "agent退保" scams disrupts the insurance market, harms consumer rights, and creates a need for stricter regulations and enforcement [8][9]. - The financial regulatory authority is working with law enforcement to enhance cooperation and improve the effectiveness of combating financial crimes [12][15]. Technological and Legislative Measures - The article mentions the use of technology and data analysis to identify and combat "agent退保" scams, with various financial institutions developing models to enhance detection and enforcement [13][14]. - Experts suggest the need for clearer legal definitions and regulations regarding illegal "agent退保" activities to improve enforcement and consumer protection [14][15].