深圳:推动纪律教育常态化长效化

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen's disciplinary education efforts have been enhanced through innovative methods and consistent engagement, aiming to internalize and externalize discipline among party members and officials [1][2] Group 1: Organizational Efforts - The Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has established guidelines to clarify educational nodes, targets, formats, and content, ensuring that discipline education is integrated throughout the entire growth cycle of officials [1] - The commission emphasizes the importance of discipline education as a systematic and foundational project, urging party organizations at all levels to take on primary responsibilities [1] Group 2: Educational Content - The commission has developed educational products that align with Xi Jinping's important discourses on strengthening party discipline, including a series of illustrated "learning notes" and visual products focusing on the Central Eight Regulations [1] - Continuous publication of interpretative articles regarding the newly revised disciplinary punishment regulations has been initiated, maintaining a focus on various educational themes [1] Group 3: Innovative Approaches - The commission has launched the "Discipline Around Us" column in local media, which has been running for 10 years, featuring over 300 installments and adapted into a short play titled "Qingfeng Teahouse" [2] - The organization has conducted four editions of the "Clean Energy of Shenzhen" microfilm and micro-video collection and exhibition activities, promoting integrity through various performances and establishing city-level integrity education bases [2] Group 4: Practical Applications - The commission integrates warning education into all stages of investigation and reform, converting case resources into educational materials promptly [2] - A comprehensive database of warning education materials covering various sectors and levels of officials has been established, promoting systematic governance and ensuring that each case serves as a warning for broader governance [2]