怎么“独立游戏制作人”就被玩成了下一个“主理人”？

Core Viewpoint - The term "independent game developer" has evolved and is often misused, leading to a decline in its reputation, similar to the term "main person" in branding [1][26]. Group 1: Definition and Perception - The concept of "main person" combines creativity, decision-making, and cultural spirit, representing a brand's persona and core competitiveness [2]. - The relationship between independent game developers and players transcends mere consumption, seeking recognition and resonance with niche cultural tastes [3][4]. - Independent game developers are not just creators but also shape the spirit conveyed through their works, with players recognizing the individual behind the game [5]. Group 2: Industry Trends and Challenges - There has been a noticeable increase in independent game developers in recent years, with many individuals adopting the title for various reasons [12][13]. - Some developers use the title "independent game developer" to navigate social situations, especially when questioned about their career and income [14][15]. - The industry has seen a mix of genuine creators and those who misrepresent themselves, leading to skepticism about the authenticity of many claiming to be independent developers [20][21]. Group 3: Impact on Reputation - The rise of individuals who falsely claim to be independent game developers has contributed to a negative perception of the title, affecting the reputation of serious creators [25][26]. - Early successful independent games helped elevate the standard of domestic independent games, contrasting with the current dilution of the term due to misuse [26]. - There is a call for vigilance against those who merely label themselves as independent developers without substantial contributions, to prevent the term from losing its value [27].