白宫请求被最高法驳回，美联储理事库克将参加未来两次议息会

Core Points - The U.S. Supreme Court has denied President Trump's request to immediately remove Federal Reserve Governor Cook during the ongoing litigation, allowing her to remain in office until a hearing in January [1][2] - Cook, the first African American woman to serve on the Federal Reserve Board, was accused by Trump of fraud related to her property declarations, but lower courts found no evidence of misconduct [5] - The Supreme Court's previous rulings indicate that while the President has some authority over federal appointments, this does not extend to the unique structure of the Federal Reserve [2][5] Group 1 - The Supreme Court's decision allows Cook to continue her role at the Federal Reserve, which is significant given the upcoming monetary policy meetings [5] - The Federal Reserve's decision-making process may be influenced by Cook's continued presence, especially with a high probability of a rate cut in October [5] - The legal battle highlights the complexities of presidential authority over independent agencies like the Federal Reserve, which operates under a distinct historical framework [2][5]