银行内部流出的4笔账，看完才知道全款买房多亏

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the hidden costs associated with paying for a house in full versus taking out a loan, highlighting that most ordinary people may incur losses in terms of liquidity, inflation, and investment returns when opting for full payment [1][3][5]. Group 1: Liquidity Costs - Full payment locks up a significant portion of savings, leaving little for emergencies, which can lead to high-interest borrowing when unexpected expenses arise [3][5]. - For example, if an individual has 1.5 million and pays 1.48 million for a house, they are left with only 20,000, insufficient for emergencies like medical expenses [3][4]. Group 2: Inflation Impact - The article discusses how inflation diminishes the value of future money, making loans more advantageous as they can be repaid with less valuable currency over time [4][5]. - Using a 2% annual inflation rate, 100 units of currency today would only be worth 82 units in 10 years, illustrating the loss of purchasing power [4][5]. Group 3: Investment Opportunities - Remaining funds after a loan can be invested, potentially generating returns that cover loan interest, whereas full payment forfeits these investment opportunities [6][7]. - For instance, if the remaining funds are invested in a high-interest savings account, the interest earned can offset the cost of loan interest, making loans financially viable [6][7]. Group 4: Long-term Returns - Long-term investments, such as index funds or education insurance, can yield significantly higher returns compared to the savings from discounts on full payments [6][7]. - The article suggests that a 1 million investment in an index fund could grow to 321 million over 20 years, far exceeding the benefits of paying in full [6][7].