智库 | 产业链“链主”：政策实践、运行逻辑与现实困境研究

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strategic importance of enhancing the resilience and security of industrial chains in the context of global supply chain restructuring and de-globalization, highlighting the implementation of "chain master" policies to support leading enterprises in driving collaborative development across the entire industrial chain [1]. Group 1: Current Development and Policy Practices of "Chain Master" Enterprises - The central government has initiated various foundational works to cultivate "chain master" enterprises, including the selection of "single champion" and "small giant" enterprises, with a total of 596 single champions and 1,832 small giants identified by 2021 [2][3]. - Local governments have accelerated the cultivation of distinctive "chain master" enterprises, with over 300 identified across various provinces by 2022, including significant numbers in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong [3]. Group 2: Policy Analysis and Implementation - The design logic of the "chain master" policy is transitioning from selective intervention to systematic empowerment, focusing on enhancing the market governance capabilities of "chain master" enterprises [7][8]. - Local governments have tailored their policies to foster "chain master" enterprises, emphasizing ecological transformation, industrial internet empowerment, and precise service matching [8][10]. Group 3: Theoretical Framework and Policy Logic - The "chain master" theory encompasses the core position of enterprises within the industrial chain, their role in promoting industrial chain security, and their influence on modernization [16][17]. - The relationship between "chain master" and "chain leader" is characterized by mutual interaction, where "chain masters" drive market dynamics while "chain leaders" provide necessary governmental support [29][30]. Group 4: Challenges and Recommendations - The international environment is increasingly complex, with technological nationalism and trade protectionism posing challenges to "chain master" enterprises, leading to issues such as reliance on foreign technology [30][31]. - Recommendations include enhancing the overall top-level design of the "chain master" policy, establishing a collaborative mechanism between "chain leaders" and "chain masters," and leveraging digital technologies to improve the overall safety of industrial chains [34][36][38].