技术入股影响公司上市，13年后要补1400万元，正确操作有四步

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current favorable environment for technology companies, highlighting the legal framework that allows for technology contributions as capital, while also addressing the potential pitfalls and complexities involved in such arrangements, particularly in relation to IPO preparations. Group 1: Legal Framework and Challenges - The new Company Law permits technology contributions as capital, but there are concerns about inflated valuations and the implications for future IPOs [1] - All shareholders must fulfill their capital contributions before an IPO, and historical compliance is scrutinized from the company's inception [1] Group 2: Case Studies - Case 1: Puyuan Precision - After 13 years, shareholders compensated the company with cash for technology contributions to meet IPO requirements, successfully listing on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [3][4] - Case 2: Anjisi - A new shareholder compensated for a former shareholder's technology contribution after the original founder exited, raising legal questions about the validity of such arrangements [3][5] - Case 3: Heng'an Jiaxin - The company reduced its registered capital to address issues related to technology contributions, which had been overvalued [5][7] Group 3: Special Handling of Technology Contributions - Case 4: Shanghang Technology - The founder's shareholding structure was manipulated through nominal transactions to facilitate technology contributions, raising concerns about the legitimacy of these actions [10][12] - The company faced inquiries regarding the rationale behind share transfers and potential conflicts of interest due to business relationships with major shareholders [14][15] Group 4: Recommendations for Technology Contributions - Genuine technology contributions must meet specific criteria, including fair pricing and proper documentation to avoid complications during IPO processes [16][19] - Companies are advised against using technology contributions if the technology is not robust enough, as it may jeopardize future listings [19]