Alphabet(US:GOOGL) Zhi Tong Cai Jing·2025-10-08 23:37Core Points - Google is defending its bundling of popular applications like Maps and YouTube with its Gemini AI service in response to the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) proposed ban, asserting that there is no evidence of monopoly power in the AI market [1] - The court has previously ruled that Google has monopoly behavior in its search and search advertising business, leading to specific remedial measures [1][3] - The DOJ is pushing for the same restrictions on Gemini as those imposed on Chrome, while Google argues that the AI industry is still developing and should be allowed to adopt similar business strategies as its competitors [3] Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - Google's attorney stated that there are no signs of monopoly in the AI market and emphasized that the court has not classified Google Maps or YouTube as monopolistic products [1] - The DOJ's investigation into potential antitrust behavior regarding Google Maps has not led to any lawsuits during the Biden administration [3] - The judge has not yet provided a timeline for the final ruling, and the case's progress will continue to be monitored [4] Market Position - YouTube has solidified its position as the preferred television service across all age groups, with a market share surpassing that of all Disney's television networks and streaming services combined, and daily viewing hours exceeding 1 billion [2] - Google Maps holds a dominant position in the digital mapping and navigation market, boasting over 2 billion monthly active users, making it one of Google's most widely used products [2] - In contrast, Apple reported its Maps users in the "hundreds of millions" range, with over 5 million third-party applications and websites relying on Google Maps for location services [2] Business Practices - Testimonies during the trial revealed that Google imposes bundling conditions on device manufacturers, requiring them to pre-install multiple Google applications to access the Play Store [2] - The judge expressed caution regarding Google's practice of leveraging its market influence to require manufacturers to pre-install Gemini alongside YouTube or Maps, as this could enhance its AI service market advantage [3]