Core Argument - Google is contesting a Justice Department proposal that would prevent it from bundling its YouTube and Google Maps apps with its Gemini AI service, asserting that these products have not been classified as monopolistic [1][3]. Legal Context - The ongoing court case involves a judge determining remedies after a ruling that found Google to have a monopoly in search and search advertising [2][4]. - Judge Amit Mehta previously ruled that Google could not pay companies to exclusively use its Search, Chrome browser, or Google Play Store, and is now deliberating on the final order's content [3][4]. Market Position - Google's legal representative stated that there has been no determination of a monopoly in the AI market, nor that YouTube or Maps are considered monopoly products [3]. - The Justice Department contends that the ruling regarding Search, Chrome, and Google Play should extend to Gemini, indicating concerns over Google's business practices [4][6]. Antitrust Case Background - The case stems from a nearly four-year legal battle initiated by the Department of Justice and 11 states, which accused Google of using anticompetitive tactics to maintain its dominance in search and search advertising since the original lawsuit was filed in October 2020 [6]. - The plaintiffs argue that Google's business practices have created barriers to entry for competitors, thereby sustaining its monopolistic status [5]. Focus on AI - The government has emphasized the importance of regulating Google's Gemini AI service, as it is viewed as a new access point for search, highlighting the significance of generative AI in the current market landscape [7].
Google Argues Against Justice Department Proposal to Ban Bundling Apps With AI