Group 1 - The construction of a nationwide unified market requires continuous efforts in improving institutional rules, breaking down factor markets, and eliminating local protectionism and market segmentation to provide a stable, efficient, and predictable development environment for various business entities [1][2] - The shift in government investment attraction and enterprise investment strategies reflects a need for new approaches, moving away from traditional methods like low land prices and tax reductions [1][2] - The promotion of fair competition is essential for market vitality, as past practices of creating "policy lowlands" and local protectionism have hindered fair competition [1][2] Group 2 - The introduction of the "Fair Competition Review Regulations" at the national level aims to eliminate practices that hinder a unified market and ensure equal access to production factors for all business entities [2] - Local innovations, such as lifecycle service lists and integrated service reforms, are being implemented to optimize the business environment, shifting focus from competing on "policy lowlands" to creating "service highlands" [2] - The establishment of a fair competition review mechanism in Jiangxi has demonstrated that removing local protection can enhance market competition and increase the competitiveness of local enterprises [3] Group 3 - A well-regulated, fair, and fully open nationwide unified market is seen as a fertile ground for societal creativity and vitality, leading to improved resource allocation efficiency and market potential [3] - Identifying roles and comparative advantages within the nationwide unified market is crucial for enhancing government services and contributing to high-quality economic development in China [3]
公平无偏差 市场添效能
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-10-09 05:27