用了自动驾驶，醉驾者责任能减轻吗（新闻看法）

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of using automated driving features while under the influence of alcohol, emphasizing that such features do not absolve the driver of responsibility for dangerous driving [1][2]. Summary by Sections Case Background - A driver, Yan, was caught driving under the influence with a blood alcohol content of 201.4 mg/100ml after a night out with friends [1]. - The initial court ruling sentenced Yan to three months of detention and a fine of 6,000 yuan for dangerous driving [1]. Legal Arguments - Yan argued that activating the vehicle's automated driving function reduced road danger and requested a lighter sentence [1]. - The court found no evidence that the automated driving feature was engaged at the time of the traffic stop, and even if it was, the vehicle was equipped only with a driver assistance system, which requires significant driver involvement [2]. Court Ruling - The Beijing Second Intermediate Court upheld the original ruling, stating that the driver remains responsible for the vehicle's operation, even when using driver assistance systems [2]. - The court emphasized that the activation of such systems does not change the driver's legal responsibility, particularly when intoxicated [2].