宗馥莉辞职了，又有人假装自己胜利

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the psychological issues of some internet users regarding the resignation of a prominent figure, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of historical context in discussions about state-owned assets and corporate governance [2][5][30]. Group 1: Company Insights - The resignation of a key figure,宗馥莉, has sparked discussions and speculation online, reflecting a broader trend of public sentiment and reaction to corporate changes [2][5]. - The article argues that the history of companies like Wahaha is often misunderstood, with claims of state asset loss being unfounded when historical context is considered [8][10][24]. - It highlights the importance of understanding the historical background and operational context of companies to avoid misinterpretations and unfounded accusations [16][32]. Group 2: Industry Context - The discussion touches on the broader implications of corporate governance and the relationship between state-owned assets and private enterprises, suggesting a mutual benefit in economic development [26][28]. - The article critiques the lack of historical awareness among some commentators, suggesting that many do not grasp the complexities of corporate history and the evolution of state-owned enterprises [29][31]. - It emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to analyzing corporate issues, advocating for a thorough investigation into historical practices rather than relying solely on current data [34][36].