风波再起，OpenAI被指通过警方向AI监管倡导者施压，马斯克锐评其「建立在谎言之上」

Core Points - A participant advocating for AI regulation received a subpoena from OpenAI, raising public concern about the company's actions [1][3][6] - Nathan Calvin, a lawyer and member of the Encode organization, criticized OpenAI for using legal tactics to intimidate those supporting AI regulation [3][6][9] - OpenAI's subpoena seeks information about Calvin's organization and its connections to Elon Musk, amid ongoing legal disputes [4][8][10] Group 1: OpenAI's Actions - OpenAI issued a subpoena to Nathan Calvin, demanding private information related to the Encode organization and its interactions with California lawmakers and former OpenAI employees [1][3] - The subpoena is part of OpenAI's broader legal strategy against Elon Musk, who has been critical of the company [4][8] - OpenAI's chief strategy officer defended the company's actions as necessary to investigate potential conflicts of interest involving Encode [8][9] Group 2: Encode Organization - Encode is a small nonprofit organization focused on AI governance, which played a role in the passage of California's SB 53 AI transparency law [3] - The SB 53 law requires large AI developers to disclose their safety protocols and update them regularly, which OpenAI opposes [3][4] - Calvin expressed frustration over OpenAI's tactics, suggesting they are aimed at silencing critics of the company [6][9] Group 3: Public Reaction - The incident has sparked significant public discussion, with many expressing concern over OpenAI's power and methods [6][10] - Other organizations, like the Midas Project, reported similar experiences with OpenAI's subpoenas, indicating a pattern of intimidation [6] - The situation highlights the need for transparency and whistleblower protections in the AI industry [6]