周波：既然美国坚持把中美关系定义为战略竞争，那么中国会说：好吧

Core Viewpoint - The discussion revolves around the perception of China's military strength and its peaceful rise as a global economic power, emphasizing that military capability does not necessarily equate to military aggression [1][2]. Group 1: China's Military and Economic Position - China has not engaged in any wars since 1979, maintaining over 40 years of peace, which has contributed to its rise as the world's second-largest economy [1][2]. - The recent military parade in Tiananmen Square showcased China's military capabilities, but it is argued that this is part of a transparency effort rather than a signal of imminent aggression [1][4]. - China's defense spending is three times that of Russia, and it possesses the largest military force globally, yet it has not engaged in direct military conflict [5][10]. Group 2: U.S.-China Relations - The relationship between the U.S. and China is characterized as a mix of competition and cooperation, with China initially advocating for collaboration [4][12]. - The Taiwan issue is highlighted as a potential flashpoint for conflict, with comparisons drawn to the U.S. stance on Russia in the Ukraine conflict [5][7]. - There is a call for increased dialogue between the U.S. and China to avoid direct conflict, emphasizing the importance of communication in addressing mutual concerns [12][13]. Group 3: Global Influence and Strategy - China is positioned as a superpower, with its influence recognized even by Western leaders, indicating a shift in global power dynamics [2][4]. - The concept of "influence" is distinguished from "sphere of influence," suggesting that China does not seek to establish a hegemonic presence like the U.S. [11]. - China's global initiatives, such as the Belt and Road Initiative, are seen as significant investments aimed at fostering development and cooperation rather than military expansion [9][10].