一天内连收四条噩耗，特朗普暴怒？要对中国所有商品加征100%关税

Core Points - The article discusses Trump's announcement of a 100% increase in tariffs on China starting in November, alongside tighter controls on software exports to China, which he claims is a response to China's new rare earth policies [1][3] - China's Ministry of Commerce has announced stricter controls on the export of rare earth materials, which are crucial for various high-tech applications, including semiconductor manufacturing [3][7] - The article emphasizes China's dominant position in the global rare earth market, controlling 40% of the world's rare earth minerals and 70% of the global extraction volume, making it a critical player in this industry [5][8] Summary by Sections Tariff Increase and Software Export Controls - Trump plans to raise tariffs on China by 100% and impose stricter regulations on software exports, claiming it is a necessary measure against China's rare earth policies [1][3] - The new U.S. tariffs and export controls are seen as retaliatory actions against China's tightening of rare earth export regulations [3][8] China's Rare Earth Policy - China's new policy on rare earths covers a wide range of materials and processes, from mining to recycling, indicating a comprehensive approach to control [3][8] - The specific rare earth materials targeted are essential for manufacturing advanced technologies, such as 5G components and semiconductors [7][8] Strategic Implications - The article suggests that China's rare earth export controls are a strategic move to maintain leverage in negotiations with the U.S., countering perceived U.S. aggression in trade talks [10][14] - Experts believe that this escalation could lead to unprecedented confrontations between the U.S. and China, intensifying the ongoing trade war [10][14] Political Context - The article notes that Trump's declining approval ratings and various political challenges may influence his aggressive stance on trade with China [16][20] - The situation is further complicated by Trump's struggles with the Federal Reserve and internal party dynamics, which could impact his administration's approach to trade policies [20][22]