以辩证思维科学准确把握与开展批评和自我批评（深入学习贯彻习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想）

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on criticism and self-criticism as essential tools for maintaining the health of the party and enhancing the capabilities of its members is highlighted, with a call for their consistent application in daily work [1][17]. Group 1: Importance of Criticism and Self-Criticism - Criticism and self-criticism are described as sharp weapons for strengthening the party and maintaining its health, serving as vital means to enhance and regulate political life within the party [2][4]. - The historical significance of criticism and self-criticism is noted, having played a crucial role in the party's development and individual growth throughout various stages of revolution, construction, and reform [1][3]. Group 2: Functions of Criticism and Self-Criticism - From an epistemological perspective, criticism and self-criticism act as a "calibrator" for truth, facilitating a continuous cycle of practice and understanding [3]. - Criticism and self-criticism are seen as a "negative intermediary" that promotes development through the dialectical process of negation, leading to constructive change within the party [4]. Group 3: Practical Challenges and Solutions - The article identifies common issues in the practice of criticism and self-criticism, such as becoming ineffective or superficial, and emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of its dual nature—both constructive and destructive [5][6]. - It suggests that effective criticism should be based on public interest, sincerity, and appropriate methods, avoiding personal biases and focusing on objective issues [7][14]. Group 4: Strategies for Effective Criticism and Self-Criticism - The importance of timing in criticism is emphasized, advocating for immediate feedback on minor issues while allowing for more time to analyze complex problems [9]. - The article discusses the balance between public and private criticism, suggesting that public criticism can foster collective learning, while private criticism is better for sensitive topics [10]. Group 5: Balancing Principles and Flexibility - A balance between principled and flexible approaches to criticism is necessary, ensuring that criticism is both constructive and respectful of individual differences [14][15]. - The need for a dynamic balance between current issues and long-term goals is highlighted, encouraging a strategic approach to criticism that supports ongoing improvement and development [16].