Workflow
“币圈历史最大惨案”:币安宕机 稳定币USDe脱锚与惨烈的“铁索连舟”
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2025-10-13 00:38

Core Insights - The recent tweet by President Trump regarding tariff threats triggered a significant sell-off in the cryptocurrency market, leading to a loss of nearly $800 billion in market capitalization and marking one of the largest liquidation events in crypto history [1][2][3] Market Reaction - Bitcoin's price fell from over $126,000 to below $110,000, experiencing a drop of 13.5% in one day, while Ethereum dropped over 17% and other altcoins like Ripple and Dogecoin saw declines exceeding 30% [1][2] - Over $20 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated, with more than $5.5 billion disappearing in just a few minutes [1][7] Centralized Exchange Issues - During the market turmoil, several centralized exchanges (CEX), including Binance, faced severe system delays and outages, preventing users from executing orders or managing positions, which exacerbated losses [1][8][13] - Users expressed anger on social media, accusing Binance of failing to provide necessary liquidity and stability during critical moments [2][13] Market Structure and Risks - The cryptocurrency market was characterized by high leverage and a significant amount of open contracts, creating a precarious environment that was susceptible to external shocks like Trump's tweet [3][5] - The cascading effect of forced liquidations led to a "waterfall effect," where one liquidation triggered another, further driving down prices [9] Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Performance - In contrast to centralized exchanges, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms like Uniswap and Aave managed to operate smoothly during the crisis, handling significant volumes without technical issues [10] - Aave processed $180 million in liquidations without human intervention, highlighting the resilience of DeFi compared to centralized platforms [10] Allegations of Market Manipulation - There are theories suggesting that the crash was not merely a market reaction but a coordinated attack exploiting vulnerabilities in Binance's unified margin system, which allowed for the mixing of various assets as collateral [11][13] - The global third-largest stablecoin, USDe, experienced severe de-pegging on Binance, dropping to $0.65 while maintaining a price of $0.90 on other platforms, raising concerns about potential market manipulation [11][13] Regulatory Implications - The incident has reignited discussions about the risks associated with centralized versus decentralized financial systems, with calls for regulatory scrutiny of centralized exchanges like Binance [15][17] - Binance acknowledged the issues caused by "extreme market activity" and assured users that their funds were safe, but the trust in centralized platforms remains shaken [15][17]