Group 1 - The core issue of the US-China trade conflict has evolved beyond mere economic competition to encompass geopolitical and technological security dimensions, with specific commodities like rare earths and lithium batteries becoming central to the confrontation [1] - The US's heavy reliance on China for critical supplies is evident, with over 90% of ibuprofen in the US sourced from China, highlighting the limitations of US retaliatory measures against China [3] - China's strategic response to US tariffs and technology restrictions demonstrates a higher level of strategic thinking, as it showcases its ability to exert influence in the supply chain while signaling a willingness to engage in dialogue [3] Group 2 - The volatility in the US stock market, particularly the significant losses experienced by tech giants, reflects the economic pressures faced by the Trump administration amid rising discontent from various industries [5] - The contrasting approaches of the US and China in handling trade tensions reveal a fundamental difference in strategic thinking, with China seeking to maximize its interests through a broader perspective while the US appears to be in a crisis management mode [5] - The ongoing tensions between the two nations suggest that future confrontations will be increasingly complex, with China's actions in critical sectors potentially having a disruptive impact on the US economy [5][6]
稀土只是前戏？美国学者：“中国还留着后招没出，美国压根无能为力”
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-10-13 05:13