解读2025年诺贝尔经济学奖：“创造性破坏”为何如此重要？

Group 1 - The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt for their contributions to the theory of innovation-driven economic growth [1][3][4] - The prize money amounts to 11 million Swedish Krona, with half awarded to Mokyr and the other half shared by Aghion and Howitt [2][3] Group 2 - Joel Mokyr is recognized for identifying the conditions necessary for sustained growth through technological advancement, emphasizing the mutual reinforcement between scientific breakthroughs and practical applications [3][10] - Mokyr's research highlights that the modern economic growth initiated post-Industrial Revolution was not due to a single technological breakthrough but rather a paradigm shift in human inquiry [10][39] - Aghion and Howitt are acknowledged for their theory of "creative destruction," which explains that economic growth is achieved through innovation that displaces outdated products and practices [4][45] Group 3 - Mokyr's work indicates that the continuous flow of "useful knowledge" is essential for sustained economic growth, contrasting the pre-Industrial Revolution reliance on normative knowledge [28][30] - Aghion and Howitt's model illustrates that "creative destruction" is the core driver of sustained growth, where new enterprises and jobs replace outdated ones, fostering a competitive environment [35][36] - Their research suggests that both high and low market concentration can hinder innovation, indicating the need for policies to manage market dynamics effectively [37][48] Group 4 - Mokyr emphasizes the importance of societal acceptance of change, as technological advancements can create both winners and losers, necessitating support for those affected [31][38] - The collaboration between Aghion and Howitt has led to significant advancements in understanding the relationship between innovation, competition, and economic growth [22][45] - Their work has implications for various fields, including education policy and financial structures, highlighting the role of government in facilitating innovation while managing its social costs [47][48]