Intel(US:INTC) Benzinga·2025-10-14 06:15Core Viewpoint - The former CEO of Intel, Pat Gelsinger, criticized the slow implementation of the CHIPS Act, emphasizing that the U.S. government's investment in Intel should lead to the construction and operation of more semiconductor fabs in the country [1][4][5]. Group 1: CHIPS Act and Government Investment - Gelsinger stated that the only important metric for the success of the CHIPS Act is whether it results in the building and filling of Intel fabs in the U.S. [3][4] - The U.S. government's investment in Intel amounts to approximately $11.1 billion, which includes common shares and previously awarded grants [3][6]. - Gelsinger expressed disappointment over the delays in deploying funds from the CHIPS Act, which he believes hindered progress towards semiconductor independence [5]. Group 2: Intel's Performance and Market Position - Over the past year, Intel's shares have increased by 58.79%, but they are down more than 31% over the last five years, attributed to long-term structural issues and a failure to adapt to the AI revolution [6]. - Gelsinger acknowledged that Intel lost its technical leadership due to poor decision-making over the past 15 years and was late to capitalize on AI opportunities [6]. - Despite Intel's recent advancements, such as the 18A process milestone, Nvidia has dominated the incremental AI data center revenue [6]. Group 3: Analyst Insights and Stock Performance - Ahead of Intel's earnings report, Bank of America analyst Vivek Arya downgraded Intel's stock to Underperform with a price target of $34, citing weaknesses in AI and server CPU businesses [8]. - Arya noted that Intel lacks a competitive AI portfolio and has limited options to divest unprofitable operations, although partnerships with Nvidia and potential U.S. funding could provide positive catalysts [8]. - Intel's shares rose by 2.45% on a recent Monday and have increased over 84% year-to-date, indicating strong momentum in the stock [9][10].