Core Insights - The Ministry of Justice has released the second batch of eight typical cases focusing on the rectification of "disorderly inspections" and "arbitrary fines," highlighting the importance of administrative law enforcement supervision in correcting enforcement irregularities and establishing a "law enforcement for the people" concept [1][2] Group 1: Issues Addressed - The article addresses the issue of "ineligible subjects" in enterprise inspections, with various government administrative law enforcement supervision agencies enhancing oversight and improving institutional mechanisms to eliminate unauthorized inspections [1] - It discusses the problem of "excessive frequency and repeated disturbances" in enterprise inspections, where agencies are innovating work models and strengthening supervisory collaboration to correct disorderly inspection behaviors [1] - The article highlights the issue of "illegal setting of penalty indicators and procedural violations," emphasizing a dual approach of "error correction and accountability + institutional improvement" to protect enterprises' legal rights [2] Group 2: Case Examples - Specific cases are mentioned, such as a county government in Henan correcting illegal penalty indicators set by the fire rescue team, and a county in Jiangxi addressing violations by transportation enforcement personnel [2] - The article notes that a county in Shandong corrected improper penalties by guiding enforcement agencies to apply non-penalty regulations based on specific facts [2] - It also mentions a county in Jilin promoting the establishment of an information-sharing mechanism among enforcement departments to avoid additional burdens on enterprises due to inter-departmental collaboration gaps [2]
聚焦整治“乱检查”“乱罚款” 司法部发布规范涉企行政执法典型案例
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-10-14 07:01