邓正红批判2025年诺贝尔经济学奖“创造性破坏”是伪命题、西方资本导向偏见

Core Viewpoint - The awarding of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences to researchers of "creative destruction" reflects the limitations of Western economic paradigms, as argued by Professor Deng Zhenghong, who emphasizes a demand-first and value accumulation perspective, fundamentally questioning the "creative destruction" theory [1][10]. Summary by Relevant Categories Creative Destruction Theory - The traditional view of "creative destruction," introduced by economist Joseph Schumpeter, describes a dynamic process where new innovations continuously disrupt and replace old technologies and products, driving long-term economic growth [2]. - Aghion and Howitt elaborated on this theory in 1992, establishing that innovation accumulation and entrepreneurial activity are core drivers of sustained growth within the endogenous growth theory framework [2]. Deng Zhenghong's Soft Power Philosophy - Deng's soft power philosophy posits that non-material capabilities can activate hard resources, creating value that far exceeds material inputs [2]. - It emphasizes the dynamic adaptability of soft power, which evolves with environmental changes, and asserts that demand is the primary driver of economic activity [3][5]. Critique of Creative Destruction - Deng argues that "creative destruction" is a false premise, asserting that economic activity should focus on value accumulation rather than destruction [3][4]. - He highlights that true innovation should address real market needs rather than pursuing innovation for its own sake, warning against the pitfalls of "disruptive innovation" that neglects genuine consumer demands [5][6]. Economic Stagnation - Deng contends that a return to economic stagnation is both reasonable and inevitable, as economic development follows inherent laws that should not be artificially manipulated to pursue continuous growth [7][8]. - He critiques the obsession with growth metrics like GDP, suggesting that stagnation can coexist with cultural richness and social well-being [7][8]. Demand-Driven Innovation - Deng's philosophy advocates for a demand-driven approach to innovation, contrasting with the Western focus on innovation-driven growth [8][9]. - He cites examples such as China's high-speed rail development, which integrates existing technologies to create superior solutions rather than simply replacing them [4]. Future Economic Paradigms - The intersection of globalization and digitalization may lead to new theoretical possibilities, where Deng's demand-driven soft power philosophy complements the innovation-driven approach of Western economics [9]. - Deng envisions a future economic model that balances demand and innovation, fostering qualitative changes within a framework of reasonable stagnation [9].