美国为什么觉得关税就能赢下世界？美国到底哪里出了问题？

Group 1 - The article discusses the historical persistence of the Qing Dynasty until 1912, attributing it to their awareness of their own reactionary nature and strategic alliances with foreign powers [1] - It highlights the contrasting perspectives of older American political figures, like Kissinger, who recognized imperialism's reactionary aspects, versus younger leaders who view the U.S. as an unassailable "beacon" of democracy [1] - The current polarized political environment in the U.S. is noted to hinder the sustainability of any strategic approach, leading to inefficiencies in governance and a significant national debt [1] Group 2 - The article outlines the challenges faced by traditional U.S. alliances, particularly under Trump's "America First" policy, which has led to increased tensions with European allies [3] - It emphasizes that the weakening of these alliances complicates the U.S. response to China, reducing the effectiveness of collective Western strategies [3] - The article suggests that the U.S. has exhausted nearly all non-military hostile actions against China since 2010, indicating a lack of new strategies [3] Group 3 - Various forms of sanctions against China are discussed, including tariffs, food sanctions, technology sanctions, and military actions, with the latter being less feasible without military superiority [5][7] - The article points out that the U.S. has relied heavily on tariffs as a primary tool due to the inability to achieve military dominance [7] - It notes that the U.S. has utilized food sanctions, particularly in the soybean market, which significantly impacts China's food supply [5]