中美互鉴：一场供给侧与需求改革的“双向奔赴”

Core Insights - The article discusses the contrasting development paths of China and the United States, highlighting how China's rapid infrastructure development and engineering-driven governance have outpaced the U.S. in certain areas [3][5][27] - It emphasizes the need for the U.S. to revitalize its manufacturing base while China must shift from construction-driven growth to a more service-oriented economy [27][32] Infrastructure and Development - The comparison of train schedules from 1915 to 2025 illustrates the stagnation of U.S. infrastructure despite its historical strength in manufacturing and transportation networks [1][2] - China's investment in infrastructure over the past two decades has created a stark contrast, with high-speed rail networks significantly outpacing U.S. developments [2][3] Governance and Economic Models - Dan Wang's framework categorizes China as "engineer-led" and the U.S. as "lawyer-led," suggesting that this structural difference contributes to the U.S.'s challenges in implementing significant reforms [3][4] - The article argues that the U.S. legalistic approach may hinder innovation and responsiveness to new economic challenges, while China's engineering focus allows for rapid project execution [4][5] Manufacturing and Innovation - The article highlights the consequences of U.S. manufacturing outsourcing, leading to a hollowing out of its industrial base and a decline in engineering expertise [6][10] - It points out that China's manufacturing capabilities have been bolstered by a large pool of engineers who have gained practical knowledge through hands-on experience [8][10] Economic Transition - The need for China to transition from an investment-driven economy to one that emphasizes consumption and service provision is emphasized [5][27] - The U.S. is encouraged to focus on restoring its manufacturing capabilities to meet the needs of its population, particularly in housing and infrastructure [27][32] Employment and Service Sector - The article discusses the structural employment challenges in China, where the service sector must expand to absorb a growing workforce [30][31] - It suggests that improving wage levels and working conditions can stimulate consumer spending and economic growth in China [31][32] Global Economic Dynamics - The article notes that the competition in high-tech industries, such as electric vehicles and AI, reflects China's growing capabilities and the need for innovation in both countries [12][27] - It warns of the potential for economic disparity as a small elite in the U.S. gains disproportionate influence over economic outcomes, contrasting with China's broader growth model [21][22][26]