连出3招没镇住中国，美国要把事闹大，特朗普明白：不能再犹豫了

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade tensions between the U.S. and China have escalated, with the Trump administration attempting to pressure China through tariffs, technology export restrictions, and limitations on aviation parts exports, but these measures have not yielded the desired results [1][3][24]. Group 1: U.S. Trade Measures - The first measure involved imposing high tariffs on all goods imported from China, aiming to create price barriers against Chinese products. However, China's robust supply chain and domestic demand have proven resilient against such tactics [3][5]. - The second measure targeted high-tech sectors, with the U.S. attempting to cut off key software supplies to hinder China's advancements in artificial intelligence and chip design. Nevertheless, China has made significant progress in domestic technology replacements, reducing the effectiveness of this strategy [5][9]. - The final measure focused on restricting exports of aircraft parts to China, aiming to impact the Chinese aviation industry. However, China has developed its own aircraft manufacturing capabilities and has begun to secure international orders, diminishing the potential impact of this restriction [7][9]. Group 2: International Alliances and Responses - Following the ineffectiveness of the initial measures, the Trump administration is seeking to form a coalition of countries to collectively pressure China, but faces challenges in garnering support from key allies like Japan and South Korea, who are cautious due to their economic ties with China [11][15]. - India's relationship with the U.S. is also tenuous, with ongoing trade negotiations and dependencies on Chinese components complicating any potential alignment against China [13][15]. - European nations are primarily focused on the Russia-Ukraine conflict and are unlikely to prioritize joining a coalition against China, as many are strengthening their economic ties with China [15][19]. Group 3: U.S. Strategic Challenges - The U.S. is struggling to find effective strategies in its dealings with China, as traditional methods of pressure and coalition-building are becoming less effective in the current international landscape [17][19]. - The increasing interdependence of global economies means that extreme pressure tactics could backfire, leading to a reevaluation of the U.S.'s role in international trade [21][24]. - The current geopolitical climate indicates that China is not intimidated by U.S. pressure and is prepared to respond strategically, maintaining its market position and exploring countermeasures if necessary [19][26].