Bei Jing Shang Bao·2025-10-14 15:47Core Viewpoint - The recent trend of brokerage firms and public funds in China canceling their supervisory boards is closely related to regulatory requirements and aims to optimize corporate governance structures and improve operational efficiency [1][3][4] Group 1: Company Actions - On October 13, both China International Capital Corporation (CICC) and Shenwan Hongyuan announced they would no longer establish supervisory boards, with their functions being transferred to the audit committee of the board of directors [2][4] - Since September, several other firms, including Dongxing Securities and Guosen Securities, have also announced similar cancellations of their supervisory boards [2][4] - Public fund companies like Huaxia Fund and Founder Fubon Fund have also taken steps to abolish their supervisory boards, delegating responsibilities to their audit committees [2][4] Group 2: Regulatory Context - The changes align with the new Company Law and related regulations, which require firms to clarify their internal supervisory structures by January 1, 2026 [4][6] - The new regulations aim to simplify and strengthen internal supervision mechanisms to enhance the overall governance level of securities and fund management institutions [4][6] Group 3: Benefits of the Change - The abolition of supervisory boards is expected to streamline decision-making processes and enhance the effectiveness of supervision by concentrating oversight within the audit committee [3][5] - Audit committees, typically composed of independent directors, are believed to provide greater independence and professionalism compared to traditional supervisory boards, thus improving oversight capabilities [5][6] - This reform reflects a heightened emphasis on transparency and accountability in modern corporate governance [4][6]