Core Insights - The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt for their contributions to "innovation-driven economic growth," particularly the "creative destruction" theory [1] - Professor Deng Zhenghong challenges this theory, labeling it a "Western capital-oriented fallacy" that overlooks the fundamental role of market demand [1][2] - Deng's "soft power philosophy" advocates for a development model prioritizing demand and value accumulation, contrasting sharply with the "creative destruction" narrative [2][3] Group 1: Theoretical Critique - Deng Zhenghong argues that "creative destruction" simplifies economic growth to a linear process of technological iteration, ignoring the natural laws of economic stagnation and the potential for resource waste due to innovations detached from actual demand [2][3] - The critique highlights the ideological differences behind economic theories, suggesting that the "creative destruction" model serves capital expansion rather than genuine human needs [2][4] Group 2: Alternative Development Model - Deng proposes a "soft power balanced development theory," integrating value recognition, institutional resilience, and public welfare into growth functions, as evidenced by successful case studies in China's technology and traditional sectors [3][4] - This model emphasizes the organic integration of technological evolution with societal needs, rejecting the sanctification of "destruction" [3][4] Group 3: Comparative Analysis - A comparison between the "creative destruction" theory and Deng's soft power philosophy reveals fundamental differences: the former focuses on technological disruption as a growth driver, while the latter emphasizes demand satisfaction [3][4] - The two theories also diverge in their approach to policy implications, with "creative destruction" encouraging technological competition, whereas Deng's philosophy advocates for demand-side management and soft power construction [3][4] Group 4: Practical Implications - Historical experiences indicate that purely "destructive innovation" often leads to social cost transfer, as seen in the 2008 financial crisis and recent global supply chain disruptions [5] - In contrast, China's approach to 5G technology exemplifies a dual-driven model of "technological innovation + institutional innovation," showcasing the practical application of Deng's soft power philosophy [5] Group 5: Future Perspectives - The potential fusion of these two theories could lead to a new paradigm, especially as global challenges necessitate a balance between technological efficiency and demand-driven growth [5] - This dynamic equilibrium may represent the next breakthrough in economic theory, akin to the duality observed in quantum physics [5]
邓正红软实力哲学：直指当代经济学的认知盲区 用数学模型包装的“创新神话”
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-10-15 08:38