Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-10-15 16:42Core Viewpoint - The recent actions taken by the Dutch government against Anshi Semiconductor, a Chinese-controlled company, highlight a significant contradiction in their approach to international trade and investment, particularly in the context of reliance on Chinese resources for high-tech industries [1][10][19] Group 1: Government Actions - The Dutch government conducted a rapid national security review of Anshi Semiconductor, completing the process in just three days, which included the immediate transfer of control without allowing the company to voice objections or participate in hearings [3][6] - The actions taken by the Dutch authorities involved a complete takeover of the company, stripping the original shareholders of their management rights and reducing their stake to a mere symbolic share [3][6] Group 2: Impact on Industry - The takeover of Anshi Semiconductor poses a significant risk to the European high-tech industry, particularly in the semiconductor sector, where many companies are already facing chip shortages [10][12] - The reliance on Chinese resources, especially rare earth elements critical for high-tech manufacturing, creates a paradox where the Netherlands seeks cooperation with China while simultaneously undermining Chinese investments [8][10] Group 3: Trust and Investment Climate - The swift and aggressive actions against a Chinese company raise concerns about the trustworthiness of the European investment climate, as it contradicts the previously emphasized principles of rule of law and market economy [10][15] - The incident could deter future foreign investments, as companies may fear similar actions could be taken against them, leading to a decline in international investment confidence [15][21] Group 4: Geopolitical Implications - The actions taken by the Netherlands may exacerbate divisions within the EU regarding trade policies with China, as different member states have varying stances on cooperation versus confrontation [12][19] - The shift in focus from regulatory frameworks to resource control indicates a changing global landscape where countries that can secure stable supply chains will hold more power [17][19]