部分城市叫停网约车“一口价” 如何平衡司乘权益？

Core Viewpoint - The "one-price" model in ride-hailing services has transformed from a consumer protection mechanism to a tool for price competition, leading to dissatisfaction among drivers and a decline in service quality [1][2][3] Regulatory Actions - Several cities, including Xi'an and Kaifeng, have implemented measures to ban the "one-price" model, aiming to address chaotic low-price competition in the ride-hailing market [1][4] - The Nanjing Transportation Bureau has proposed a draft regulation that includes a minimum hourly income for drivers, marking a significant step in protecting driver rights [4] Industry Dynamics - The "one-price" model, initially designed to protect consumers from unfair practices, has now become a primary method for price competition, resulting in an increase in its order share and driver dissatisfaction [2][3] - Major platforms are engaging in a price war, which benefits consumers in the short term but threatens the long-term viability of the industry by harming driver earnings and service quality [3] Driver Concerns - Drivers report that the "one-price" model leads to increased workload without corresponding income growth, as the revenue from such orders often only covers driving costs [3] - The implementation of performance-based incentives by platforms forces drivers to accept "one-price" orders, further exacerbating their dissatisfaction [3] National Guidelines - The National Development and Reform Commission and the State Administration for Market Regulation have issued guidelines to combat price disorder in the market, emphasizing the need for fair competition and adherence to pricing standards [4]