Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2025-10-16 00:30Core Viewpoint - A fierce debate is unfolding on Wall Street regarding loan risks, particularly following the bankruptcies of Tricolor Holdings and First Brands Group, highlighting tensions between traditional banks and private equity firms over accountability for credit market turmoil [1][2]. Group 1: Bank and Private Equity Tensions - The recent bankruptcies have intensified the longstanding conflict between traditional banks and private equity firms, with banks accusing private equity of regulatory arbitrage and private equity firms countering that banks should examine their own practices [2][5]. - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has called for regulatory scrutiny of banks' exposure to private credit, noting that banks are increasingly lending to private credit funds due to higher net asset returns compared to traditional commercial loans [2][6]. Group 2: Responses from Private Equity Leaders - Marc Rowan, CEO of Apollo Global Management, attributed the bankruptcies to banks' long-standing pursuit of high-risk borrowers, suggesting that the competitive market environment has led to shortcuts in lending practices [3][4]. - Jonathan Gray, President of Blackstone, echoed Rowan's sentiments, emphasizing that the failures were rooted in bank-led processes and denying the notion of systemic issues [3][4]. Group 3: Bank's Acknowledgment of Issues - Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, acknowledged the bank's exposure in the Tricolor case, admitting that it revealed internal issues and that the situation warranted increased vigilance [4][6]. - The bankruptcies have triggered a chain reaction in the credit market, with significant losses reported by major investment firms and banks, including a $170 million loss for JPMorgan Chase due to Tricolor's collapse [4][6].