美议员说了真心话，政府关门是“魔术”，为掩盖近38万亿国债危机

Core Points - The U.S. government is experiencing a shutdown, which is drawing attention away from the rapidly increasing national debt, now approaching $38 trillion [1][2] - The debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to reach 116% by 2034, marking a historical high [2] - The ongoing political stalemate between the two parties has resulted in multiple failed attempts to pass temporary funding bills, exacerbating the situation [4][9] Group 1: Debt Crisis - As of October 2025, the national debt has surpassed $37.86 trillion, with a significant increase in annual interest payments now exceeding $1.12 trillion, making it the second-largest federal expenditure after Social Security [2][5] - The current fiscal year deficit has reached $2.13 trillion, the highest level outside of the pandemic period, equating to nearly $60 billion in new debt daily [9] - Industry experts, including Ray Dalio, have warned that the rapid growth of U.S. debt could lead to a crisis similar to the pre-World War II era within the next two to three years [18] Group 2: Economic Impact of the Shutdown - The shutdown is causing significant disruptions in public services, including airport delays and the closure of museums, which are affecting daily life and public welfare [11][13] - The economic cost of the shutdown is estimated at approximately $15 billion per day, with potential long-term impacts on GDP growth [22] - The ongoing political conflict is overshadowing the pressing need to address the national debt, with both parties seemingly ignoring the implications of the debt exceeding $38 trillion [34] Group 3: Political Dynamics - The Republican Party holds a slim majority in Congress but requires Democratic support to pass funding bills, leading to a deadlock [4] - The political blame game continues, with both parties accusing each other of playing political tricks, while the underlying debt issue remains unaddressed [9][30] - Recent closed-door meetings have acknowledged the debt crisis, with proposals for stricter funding rules that could complicate future negotiations [28]