Workflow
激战中国市场:耐克销售下滑,阿迪达斯“高调”进击
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao·2025-10-17 12:42

Core Insights - The global sports footwear and apparel industry is largely characterized by the competition between Nike and Adidas, with a historical context of dominance by German, American, and Japanese brands before Nike's rise in the 1980s [1][2]. Market Dynamics - Nike surpassed Adidas in North America in 1980, achieving a market share of 50%, while Adidas struggled due to a lag in the sports fashion trend [2]. - Since 2017, domestic brands like Anta and Li-Ning have rapidly gained market share in China, leading to a significant decline in Adidas's position, which fell below Nike, Anta, and Li-Ning by 2024 [3][4]. Performance Metrics - In the Chinese market, Nike's market share decreased from 18.1% in 2021 to 16.2% in 2024, while Adidas's share dropped from 15% to 8.7% during the same period [12]. - As of the latest fiscal quarter, Nike's revenue in Greater China fell by 10% to $1.512 billion (approximately 10.775 billion RMB), with a notable decline in both direct and wholesale channels [7]. Competitive Strategies - Adidas reported a 2.2% increase in revenue to €5.952 billion (approximately 49.625 billion RMB) in Q2, with Greater China being a key growth driver, showing an 11% increase to €798 million (approximately 6.653 billion RMB) [11]. - Adidas's operating profit margin in China reached 22.7%, surpassing that of Europe and North America, indicating a strong performance in the region [11]. Brand Positioning - Domestic brands are increasingly competitive, with claims that they have closed the product gap with Nike, focusing on high-quality products at competitive prices [9]. - Nike is responding to market pressures by enhancing its investment in China, including the transformation of retail spaces into sports experience centers and optimizing product offerings [15][18]. Leadership Changes - Nike appointed Dong Wei as the new chairperson and CEO for Greater China, emphasizing the importance of the Chinese market in its recovery strategy [18][19].