Workflow
美国要对华加税500%,被俄罗斯嘲讽:加7000%也没用,谁更有底气
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-10-19 05:20

Group 1 - The proposal of a 500% tariff on Chinese goods by U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent has sparked significant concern among Wall Street investors, as such a high tariff would drastically increase prices and diminish market competitiveness [1][2][3] - Bessent's sudden shift from previously stating that a 100% tariff was unlikely to proposing a 500% tariff raises questions about the seriousness and feasibility of this policy, with many investment institutions viewing it as a mere attention-seeking tactic [2][3] - The stock market reacted negatively to the tariff proposal, with shares of import trade companies experiencing significant declines, indicating a lack of trust in the proposed policy [2][12] Group 2 - The extreme tariff threat is perceived as a political maneuver rather than a viable economic policy, with experts suggesting that such high tariffs would not effectively penalize China but rather serve as a form of political theater [4][5] - The U.S. administration's reliance on extreme tariff threats highlights a lack of alternative effective policy measures, as evidenced by China's strategic response of implementing export controls on critical materials like rare earths [5][11] - The internal division within the U.S. regarding the extreme tariff policy is evident, as financial markets express skepticism about its feasibility, contrasting with the political rhetoric [12][14]