从实力地位出发，美国可以割让夏威夷给中方！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the absurdity of the U.S. negotiation tactics with China, highlighting the lack of genuine intent to reach an agreement and the use of manipulative strategies to keep China in a reactive position [1][9][14]. Group 1: U.S. Negotiation Tactics - The U.S. has employed a series of unreasonable demands during negotiations, such as requiring China to sell all state-owned enterprises and appoint U.S. directors to Chinese companies [6][7]. - The U.S. negotiators often introduce new topics or conditions during discussions, which are seen as tactics to maintain control and pressure China into concessions [3][9]. - The article criticizes the U.S. negotiation team as being disorganized and living in a fantasy, suggesting that their approach is more about creating new issues rather than seeking a resolution [5][14]. Group 2: China's Response Strategy - The article suggests that China should adopt a similar approach to the U.S. by proposing its own demands, such as seeking compensation for trade losses and questioning U.S. territorial integrity [11][12]. - It emphasizes the need for China to take the initiative in negotiations, moving away from a reactive stance to one where it sets the agenda [16][18]. - The article argues that China has the right to raise significant issues, such as the dominance of the U.S. dollar and the implications of U.S. military actions, as part of the negotiation framework [16][18].